The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the date and time stated in the facts charged in the instant case, there is a fact between the restaurants operated by the injured party and the restaurant, there is no desire or pedagoging.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant took a bath at a restaurant operated by the victimized person while under the influence of alcohol, and the victim changed from the restaurant.

In spite of the demand, it continued to interfere with the victim's restaurant business by neglecting his/her failure.

Recognized.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is rejected.

1) In an investigative agency and a court of the court below, the victim: “The defendant found on September 1, 2015, at a restaurant around 07:30, and her husband’s name was attached and her husband took a bath.”

The defendant's " why he wishes to her husband or not"

“In making a port of call, he was led to a restaurant, and the Defendant was unable to do so for a time as much as possible, such as the Defendant intending to take her hand, etc.

On the wind, customers who have boomed at the restaurant was able to provide guidance on money.

“The statements have been consistently made.”

No such circumstance is found to suspect the above statement.

2) In particular, the victim immediately after the report is made by the victim, “Before the instant report, the Defendant is subject to punishment for insult as a crime of insult against the victim.”

For this reason, the defendant often put up a ticket to the restaurant.

The husband and the defendant reached a compromise on the day before the instant case

In addition, in order to bring about her husband's desire to do with cafeteria, she was "I am and I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am.

“At the same time,” she was fluencing in a restaurant.

“.......”

In fact, on January 25, 2015, the Defendant expressed that he/she had expressed his/her desire to “the time of selling” to the victim on or around February 26, 2015.