logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.25 2018고합595
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged were appropriately revised to the extent that it does not impede the defendant's exercise of right to defense.

1. Interference with business;

A. On November 22, 2018, at around 10:15, the Defendant: (a) 10:15, at a “D” restaurant working for C, the spouse of the Defendant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) around November 22, 2018, at around 01:30, on the grounds that the Defendant assaulted C, and the Defendant’s son, who was arrested and investigated in the act of committing an act of committing an act of assaulting C; (c) confirmed C’s absence in the above restaurant; and (d) described C in C, referring to “Chewing, dead, and f2 years of age”; and (c) 10 minutes of booms, such as breging brus and water residues located therein.

The Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim’s restaurant business.

B. On November 22, 2018, the Defendant at the above restaurant around 17:00, and the above A.

For the same reasons as the entry in the port, C met with C, and found C as the above restaurant, C confirmed that it was not in the above restaurant, she saw C employee F of the restaurant who was on duty, and she took a bath to the customer F of the victim of the restaurant who was on duty, she took a bath to "Chewing, dead, ..." while referring C, and she took a bath to the customer, and she took a 30-minute stop, such as forcing the restaurant stack to be closed.

The Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim’s restaurant business.

2. Around November 22, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) at a restaurant where the trade name in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City is unknown, and the above 1-A.

For the same reasons as described in paragraph (1), the complaint is raised, and the victim C calls to the victim, and the victim “I do not want to do so. I do not am close and close. I do not ambling. I will not ambling off. I will ambling off. I will ambling off. I will ambling off, I will ambling. I will ambling off. I will ambling off. I will ambling off. I will ambling off. I will ambling the victim several times. I would not find the victim even though I find it to D restaurants working for the victim as described in paragraph (1).

arrow