The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the Defendant is recognized to have forged the written move-in report in the name B without being delegated with the authority to prepare the move-in report from a de facto marital person B, and submitted it to the employee of the community service center.

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that it is difficult to believe that the Defendant, without permission, used his seal to use it in the column for the name of the householder of the move-in report of this case, and rather, it is difficult to completely eliminate the possibility that the Defendant would have caused the Defendant’s removal of the seal on the move-in report of this case with his consent, and that it would be difficult to completely eliminate the possibility of signing the move-in report.

Examining the judgment of the court below in light of the evidence above, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no illegality that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

Therefore, the prosecutor's argument of mistake is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.