All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (for defendant A, six months of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence, one year of defendant H, I, J, K: each suspended sentence of sentence of imprisonment, four months of suspended sentence of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment, and three million won in case of defendant R: fine; and two million won in case of defendant S, T, and U) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is committed by Defendant A with the office of the victim AC limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as “AC”), and interferes with the duties by force by interfering with the manager’s access or by blocking his street, etc. The CCTV and the bus screen in the victim AC office is damaged. Defendant H, I, J, and K are sitting in front of the bus of the AC office and interfered with the duties of the victim AC by standing in front of the bus that Defendant H, I, J, and K intended to depart, and Defendant P is going to interfere with the duties of the AC. Defendant P, along with other members, leaving the AB bus transportation business association office to pressure AC.

Considering the fact that Defendant P, S, R, H, I, T, and U refused to comply with the Gu and interfered with the business of the above union, and that Defendant P, R, and H, T, and U interfered with the utility of the order keeping line while participating in an assembly, or that they interfered with the order by exercising violence against the police officers, the crime is very serious in light of the law of crime, content, result, etc., and that Defendant P, R, and S has a record of criminal punishment for violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, etc.,

I would like to say.

However, the defendants led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, the defendants appear to be considered in the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and all of the complaint and accusation of this case were revoked. The defendants agreed with the victim AC, the defendants H, I, and J did not have any past record of criminal punishment, the defendants A, K, R, S, T, and U did not have any past record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine, and the crimes of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint withdrawal) against the defendant P and the above defendants are committed.