logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.17 2019나10360
부당이득금
Text

1. The appeal filed by the plaintiff F, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, T, U, V, X, Y, AA, AB, and the defendant is all dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for a judgment in this case by the court of first instance shall be quoted in the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act;

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims shall be accepted within the above scope of recognition and the remaining claims shall be dismissed on the grounds of its reasoning. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiff F, H, I, J, K, L, M, M, N, P, Q, Q, R, T, U, V, X, Y, AA, AB, and the defendant's appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow