The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Around April 6, 2014, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in the Gumi-si C Apartment 102 Dong 205, (b) filed complaints with the Defendant that it is difficult for the Defendant to operate D due to any veterinarian located in the port area from F, the president of D, which was known to ordinary places of view; and (c) through the Internet, access to the following Arara petition site and “G” (hereinafter “G”); (d) the young veterinarian’s medical fees were reduced; and (e) the young veterinarian’s medical care fees were reduced for six veterinarians who serve the D’s strong care fees; and (e) the number of Posi-si’s society used subsidies for viewing from Posi-si to 100,000 to 40,0000, 14,0000 from 14, 40,000,000 to 4,000.

As a result, the Defendant revealed openly false facts through information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim H, I, J, K, L, and M, a member of the K K, K, K, which is a member of the K K of the K of Me

2. Determination

A. The crime of defamation 1 is established by damaging a certain person or an organization holding a particular character. Therefore, the victim is required to be specified. The defamation caused by so-called collective labeling is difficult to interpret that the content of defamation is against a specific person belonging to the group, and if the criticism caused by collective labeling is made against an individual member, the degree of criticism is dilution and thus, the social assessment of each member is made.