logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.17 2016고단3118
제주특별자치도설치및국제자유도시조성을위한특별법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. If a foreigner who enters the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province without a visa from Jeju-do to stay in the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (hereinafter referred to as "Do") for the purpose of tourism or passage in violation of the Special Act on the Establishment of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and the Development of Free International City, intends to move to another area of the Republic of Korea,

The Defendant, who is a national of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China"), had a proposal 63,000 on the name of Bracker, China, with the aid of the said Brer, intended to illegally enter the Republic of China via Jeju-do without the visa. On October 19, 2014, the Defendant started the international airport located in the State of China's port and entered Jeju-do to the International Airport of Jeju-do without the visa.

After that, on October 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) concealed the broman’s name-free shipbuilding broman’s brogate of the vehicle he prepared; and (b) was on board the bromoer’s vessel; (c) exceeded Jeju-do; and (d) arrived at a port outside Jeju-do located outside Jeju-do of the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the Defendant entered the airport of Jeju-do without the above visa and moved to another area of the Republic of Korea without obtaining the permission of the Minister of Justice for extension of sojourn area.

2. Any foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act may sojourn in the Republic of Korea within the limits of the status and period of sojourn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant exceeded Jeju-do without a visa and moved to another area without a visa, and continued to stay until June 7, 2016 after the lapse of the period of stay on November 18, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was staying in excess of the scope of the period of stay as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender;

arrow