A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. If a foreigner who enters the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province without a visa from Jeju-do to stay in the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (hereinafter referred to as "Do") for the purpose of tourism or passage in violation of the Special Act on the Establishment of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and the Development of Free International City, intends to move to another area of the Republic of Korea,

The Defendant, who is a national of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China"), had a proposal 53,000 of the Chinese name Bracker's name, and had the said Brer's aid to illegally enter the Republic of China via Jeju-do without a visa. On October 21, 2014, the Defendant started from an airport of the Republic of China, which was the best entry into the Republic of China for tourism purposes and entered Jeju-do into the Republic of Jeju-do without a visa.

After that, on October 2014, the Defendant concealed the broman’s name-free Korean Bracker from the luxane of the vehicle he prepared by the Defendant, and the fluor was on board the said vehicle on the luxian vessel, and arrived at a port outside Jeju-do located outside Jeju-do of the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the Defendant entered the airport of Jeju-do without the above visa and moved to another area of the Republic of Korea without obtaining the permission of the Minister of Justice for extension of sojourn area.

2. Any foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act may sojourn in the Republic of Korea within the limits of the status and period of sojourn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant exceeded Jeju-do without a visa and moved to another area without a visa, and continued to stay until June 8, 2016 after the lapse of the period of stay on November 20, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was staying in excess of the scope of the period of stay as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender;

1. The current status of each individual's entry and departure;