logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.09.27 2019고정1692
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 3,500,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 2,500,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 1,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants partly revised the facts charged to the extent that it does not impede the Defendants’ exercise of their right to defense.

Defendant

C, B, and A operate the frequency in the D language market, and the defendant C and the defendant B are simplified in the D language market, and the victim operates the frequency in the same fish market.

피고인들은 2018. 12. 10. 21:40경 인천 중구 E에 있는, D어시장 1층에서 피해자 F(34세)이 나이도 어린 놈이 반말을 하고 욕설을 하였다는 이유로 피고인 C은 피해자의 머리채를 잡아당기며 폭행하고, 피고인 B도 이에 합세하여 피해자의 머리채를 잡아당기며 폭행하고, 피고인 A도 피해자의 머리채를 잡고 끌고 가 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 폭행하여 코뼈가 골절되고, 눈 부위가 찢어지고 입술이 찢어져 6바늘 꿰매는 상해를 가하여, 피해자에게 21일간 치료를 요하는 비골의 골절 상해를 가하였다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim at several times and inflicted an injury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A medical certificate of injury, or victim's photograph;

1. The accusation sheet (including documents, photographs, etc. attached to each body) (the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court appears to have been involved in the instant crime at the time of the instant case. However, the Defendants did not assert to the effect that they were unable to memory under the influence of alcohol in this court, and in light of the details and content of the instant crime and the circumstances before and after the instant crime committed by each of the above evidence, it does not appear that the Defendants did not have the ability or ability to make a decision on their own things, or did not appear to have reached a weak condition.).

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.

arrow