The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (a year of suspended sentence of one year, confiscation, confiscation, 1,700,000 additional collection) is deemed to be too uneasy and unreasonable.

2. The fact that illegal game room business, such as the instant crime, is detrimental to the people’s sound sense of work, and that there is considerable social prejudice, and that there is a need to strictly punish the game room business as it does not eradicate continuous crackdown, etc., is disadvantageous to sentencing.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) there was a history of having been punished several times by fines, but there was no record of being punished for the same crime; and (c) the period of running the instant game room is relatively short; and (d) other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too un

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.