The appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor shall be dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant: The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment of 6 months and the additional collection of 7920,000 won) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor: The lower court’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and the running period of the instant game hall is relatively short is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the illegal game room business is likely to undermine the people's awareness of sound labor, and it is necessary to punish strictly because it does not eradicate the continuous crackdown. The defendant continues to operate the G Game site even after it was controlled by the crime of the D Game site, the defendant was punished by a fine in 2008, imprisonment in 2010, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspension of execution due to the crime of this species, and the defendant attempted to conceal his crime through F after the control.

Considering the above circumstances and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be excessively heavy or unreasonable.

All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.

3. The appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.