logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.08.13 2015가합30411
약정금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 135,000,000 with respect thereto to the Plaintiff and the period from December 20, 2014 to August 13, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C is a person who runs the beauty room franchise business from around 2009 to the name of “D”.

B. On December 26, 2013, Defendant C and E agreed to sell business rights, including the right of lease, to Defendant B, to the 250,000,000 won (a price including KRW 200,000,000,000,000) under the joint operation of a mutual beauty room, “D Cheongdam headquarters” (hereinafter “instant building”) in the third floor of the 296,62 square meters of the Seoul F building, Gangnam-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant building”).

Defendant C, as of the same day, shall bear all the expenses incurred by Defendant B in operating the beauty art room of this case. Defendant C agreed to guarantee Defendant B’s profits of KRW 10,000,000 per month by continuing to operate the beauty art room of this case, and to divide excess profits of KRW 10,000,000 into 50.

(2) According to the aforementioned agreement, the Defendants jointly leased the instant building from G owner of the instant building from January 1, 2014 to April 30, 2019, and the term of lease from January 1, 2014 to April 30, 2019, and the rent of KRW 8,000,000 per month from January 1, 2014 to April 30, 2015, and from May 1 through April 30, 2015 to April 30, 2017, the Defendants agreed to the effect that the instant lease agreement was jointly concluded with the head office “No. 40,00,00 won” (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 8,50,000, May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2017).

As of October 2014, Defendant C, the president of the Hague Department, I, the vice president J, the Chief K, K, L, the president of the Meak Business Department, the vice president N, the N, the Chief N, the director of the office, and the team P, etc. were in office as of Defendant C, the head of the Hague Department.

In this case, ‘the people other than Defendant C' are now existing.

arrow