beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s KRW 1,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from March 10, 2017 to February 14, 2019 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff has operated the beauty art room in the name of “G” in the Guro-si (hereinafter “the beauty room in this case”).
B. From July 1, 2010, Defendant C served as a beauty artist (hruner) from July 8, 2008 to July 8, 2008.
C. From among those, Defendant B entered into a free business income contract with each other (hereinafter “instant contract”) around November 22, 2013, and around November 20, 2013, Defendant C entered into a free business income contract with each other (hereinafter “instant contract”). The main contents are as shown in the attached sheet.
Since then, around March 14, 2015, Defendant B terminated each of the instant contracts on November 11, 2016 and suspended the beauty room of this case.
E. Around November 19, 2016, Defendant B opened a cosmetic of the trade name “E” from the cosmetic of this case to the present day after opening the cosmetic of approximately 237 meters (the distance in the event of moving to the Do newsletter, and the straight line seems to be higher than the straight line) away from the Do Government D and the 2nd floor.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendants agreed to the effect that “The Plaintiff and the Defendants may not actually participate in the management and operation of the Plaintiff’s store (including, even if the Plaintiff’s name is opened or another person’s name is included) for at least two years after the contract is terminated.”
However, after cancelling the instant contract with the Plaintiff, Defendant B opened and operates the beauty art room with the trade name “E” at a place less than 237 meters away from the instant beauty art room.
In addition, Defendant C also opened and operated the above “E” beauty room with Defendant B after cancelling the contract of this case with the Plaintiff on the grounds that Defendant C wishes to work in Seoul after the rest.
Since Defendant C violated the above non-commercial prohibition agreement, Defendant C’s government D until November 11, 2018.