Text
1. The claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 28, 2007, Seoul Special Metropolitan City made a public announcement of the designation of an urban development zone and the formulation of a development plan (Seoul Metropolitan City public notification E) with the content that the project operator is to implement the Seoul D Urban Development Project (hereinafter “instant project”) with the project operator as the Seoul Special Metropolitan City SH Corporation on the size of 548,313 square meters of Songpa-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City,
B. On Nov. 6, 2008, SH Corporation announced the relocation measures (Public Notice No. 51) including the content that “A person who owned or cultivated farmland of a size as stipulated in Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Farmland Act within the instant business area from February 26, 2007, which is the base date for relocation measures, and who lost his means of livelihood, loses his right to be supplied with shares below 16.5m2, such as subscription share certificates or commercial land, to the person who voluntarily relocated.”
C. On February 26, 2007, the Defendant had installed facilities necessary for agricultural production, such as plastic houses with a size of not less than 330 square meters, located in the instant project district, in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was selected as a person subject to livelihood measures (person subject to compensation for agricultural loss) in accordance with the aforementioned relocation measures, by recognizing that the Defendant cultivated and cultivated agricultural products, etc. in the said project district.
On January 10, 2013, SH Corporation: (a) supplied 669 persons subject to livelihood measures by dividing the commercial area of 19,809 square meters into five commercial areas in the instant project district into 8-1 through 5-5; (b) supplied the commercial land to a cooperative consisting of persons subject to livelihood measures who are not individuals; and (c) announced the commercial land supply guidance in a way that the cooperative supplied with the commercial land can implement new construction projects, such as commercial areas.
E. On October 201, G Cooperatives (hereinafter “instant Association”) was established, which is an association for the purchase of commercial lots in the instant business district, around October 201, and the Defendant was a member of the said association.
F. On October 25, 201, the Plaintiff is the Defendant and the lower.