Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On June 28, 2007, Seoul Special Metropolitan City made a public announcement of the designation of urban development zones and the formulation of development plans (Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notification E) with the content that the project implementer shall implement the D Urban Development Project (hereinafter “D Urban Development Project”) with the project implementer as the Seoul Special Metropolitan City SH Corporation on the size of 548,313 square meters of Songpa-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan
B. On Nov. 6, 2008, SH Corporation made a public announcement of the relocation measures (public noticeF) that “The person who owned or cultivated farmland of a size as stipulated in Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Farmland Act within the instant business area from February 26, 2007, which is the base date for relocation measures, and lost his means of livelihood, lost his/her right to be supplied with shares below 16.5m2 square meters, such as the purchase of shares in the relevant district or commercial land, to the person who voluntarily relocated.”
C. On February 26, 2007, the Defendant had installed facilities necessary for agricultural production, such as plastic houses with a size of not less than 330 square meters, located in the instant project district, in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City located in the instant project district, and had cultivated and cultivated crops, etc., and was selected as a person subject to livelihood measures (person subject to compensation for agricultural loss) following the said relocation measures.
On January 10, 2013, SH Corporation: (a) supplied 669 persons subject to livelihood measures by dividing the commercial area of 19,809 square meters into five commercial areas in the instant project district into 8-1 through 5-5; (b) supplied the commercial land to a cooperative consisting of persons subject to livelihood measures who are not individuals; and (c) announced the commercial land supply guidance in a way that the cooperative supplied with the commercial land can implement new construction projects, such as commercial areas.
E. On October 201, H Association, an association for the purchase of commercial lots in the instant project district, was established (hereinafter “instant association”), and the Defendant was a member of the said association.
F. Nonparty I on behalf of the Plaintiff on August 18, 201.