1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the annex sheet;

B. From March 25, 2017, the above A

subsection (b).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 25, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant to pay the Defendant KRW 30 million for rental deposit, KRW 1.2 million for monthly rent, and the lease period from July 25, 2015 to July 24, 2017, KRW 180,000 for monthly rent at the time of default of rent (hereinafter “instant building”).

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

The Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff the monthly rent from March 25, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 7 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the judgment on the cause of the claim, since the instant lease contract was terminated upon the expiration of the period, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff, and pay KRW 1,380,000 each month from March 25, 2017 when the Defendant did not pay the rent to the Plaintiff (i.e., monthly rent of KRW 1,200,000) from March 25, 2017 to the time when the said building is transferred (i.e., monthly rent of KRW 1,200

3. The defendant's argument as to the defendant's assertion asserts that the plaintiff did not faithfully respond despite having requested consultation on the overdue rent and the damage of the glass of the building of this case from one month prior to the expiration date of the contract, and that the plaintiff claimed the overdue interest in a unilateral and unilateral manner.

On the other hand, there is no evidence to comply with the defendant's above argument, and regarding the overdue agreement, the above argument by the defendant is acceptable, since it is acknowledged as mentioned above.

4. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified.