beta
Text
1. There is no obligation of the Plaintiff to pay damages to the Defendant regarding the traffic accident stated in the attached list.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that runs a passenger transport business, and is the owner of a D bus (hereinafter referred to as the “instant bus”) and the E-user of the said bus.
B. On May 7, 2018, at around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) was seated after boarding the instant bus driven by E; (b) around 17:25, the Defendant was trying to get out of the bus stops located in the front bus stops in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangseo-gu; and (c) took off one stop at the seat of the bus among the used buses.
C. After that, on May 14, 2018, the Defendant was diagnosed by the 9 cage cage cage cages that require four weeks of medical treatment at G Hospital, and from May 16, 2018.
6. By May 21, 200, he was hospitalized in a H hospital.
【In the absence of any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings】
2. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant did not suffer an injury due to the accident of this case, or that even if he suffered an injury, the plaintiff is not due to the negligence of the plaintiff's driver, and thus, the defendant has no obligation to pay damages.
In this regard, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff should compensate the defendant for damages because the plaintiff suffered a cage cagefage due to the negligence of the plaintiff's driver.
3. According to the video of evidence No. 1 of the board board, the Defendant: (a) took an animal in order to board the bus of this case to get a seat and have a seat; (b) the fact that a male passenger entering the seat with the passenger entering the bus of this case is shot or has passed without any specific contact with the Defendant, and the Defendant saw a seat once she sits on the seat part; and (c) the vehicle at that time she skes itself at that time.
It seems that there is no reason to believe that a driver or a driver has caused a sudden outbreak, and that the defendant has immediately brought about it without any action such as immediately complaining for the pain or impairing the upper part.