The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal reveals that the Defendant found the following facts: (a) although the Defendant was aware of the victim’s photographing bags and bags, the Defendant did not citing the victim’s bags.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined, i.e., CCTV screen: (a) the defendant was found to have been on board the bus of this case to have been seated by the victim; (b) the defendant moved to his seated by the victim; and (c) he was found to have been on board the bus of this case; and (d) the defendant was on the part of the victim when he left the bus; and (b) the defendant was found to have been on the part of the new car that had been built at the time of getting out of the bus, and was on the part of the defendant when he was on the ground that he was on board the bus, such as sports and documents, etc., but it seems to have been very unusual that the defendant was on the part of the new bus of this case, and therefore, it seems that the credibility of the defendant's assertion was low; (c) the defendant could not be found to have been on the part of the victim; and (d) the fact that the victim was on the part of the victim.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.