1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 10,091,298 and KRW 8,443,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 10,091,298 from August 28, 2014, and KRW 34,460.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A (D) and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a child liability insurance contract with F to pay insurance money within the limit of KRW 50 million upon occurrence of legal liability for bodily injury caused by an accident involving others’ daily life (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. On August 28, 2014, at around 15:00, Plaintiff A had a conversation with a fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluoralsium A, etc., where Plaintiff A et al. had a fluorial fluoral fluoral fluoral flus

C. The plaintiff A spent a total of KRW 1,648,290 for the treatment of the injury in this case, and must make a temporary colon until he becomes an adult (the temporary colon is KRW 3-5 and the expenses are KRW 300,000 for the temporary colon and KRW 9,000 for the combustion and anesthesia). A temporary colon shall be adjusted every three months after he becomes an adult (the adjustment expenses are KRW 30,00). After he becomes an adult, he/she must perform the operation of the ccolon (the expenses for the operation of the ccolon) and replace the upper colon (the unit cost of KRW 600,000) every ten years until he/she reaches 80 years of age.

However, there are 21,00 won of medical expenses each time of temporary colonization and adjustment, and each time of replacement of upper relic and upper relic.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 16 and Eul evidence 1; the result of physical appraisal; the purpose of each fact inquiry, reply, and the whole pleadings with respect to the Korea National University Hospital, G dental clinic, H dental clinic, Seoul National Dental Hospital, Seoul Dental Hospital, and I dental clinic

2. According to the above fact of recognition of the occurrence of damages liability, the injury of the plaintiff A in this case leaves room for the plaintiff A, etc. in dialogue with other friendships without any reason.