A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2020, at around 00:30 on 00:30, the Defendant received a notice of penalty concerning the unclaimed-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-on-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-off-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The notification of penalty payment in the police statement statement related to D shall be filed with the penalty payment report (Attachment to a scam image data), the application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant repeated the case despite the previous conviction of the obstruction of the performance of official duties: Provided, That the judgment is rendered as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions, including the fact that the degree of the obstruction of the performance of official duties of this case is not much serious, that part of the amount of damage was deposited to the victimized police officers,