(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.11.04 2016고정176

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.11.04 2016고정176

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 26, 2013, the Defendant entered into a false statement that “A victim C subcontracted the construction work from a new housing construction company located in Gyeonggi-si B, Gyeonggi-do, to the victim C” at the site of a new housing construction company located in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do. The Defendant would pay KRW 7890,000 for the construction cost within three days as the construction work ends.”

However, the defendant did not have been awarded a subcontract from the pension company, and the victim did not have the intent or ability to pay the construction cost within three days even after the completion of the construction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim complete the heating construction work, and did not pay the amount equivalent to KRW 7890,000 for the construction cost, thereby acquiring the same pecuniary benefit.

2. On March 28, 2014, the Defendant entered into a false statement that the victim D would pay the construction cost immediately after the completion of the civil construction work on the ground that the victim D was awarded a subcontract for the civil construction work at the new housing construction site located in Gyeonggi-si E, Gyeonggi-si, and that the victim D would be the vice president of Dong-nam DNS, and that it would be awarded a subcontract for the new housing construction work.

However, the fact was that the defendant only lent the name of the (ju) DoNS, and there was no intention or ability to pay the construction cost even after the victim completes the construction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim do work by lending sckes from April 16, 2014 to the victim, and stated that the charges of KRW 1,1150,00 for construction cost are “1,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.” However, it is obvious that the record is an

It did not pay a considerable amount of money and acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount of money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police officer against D and C.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2013.05.16 2013고정960

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.06.07 2017고단2506

-청주지방법원 2021.04.29 2020고단1451

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.02.06 2013고단638

-부산지방법원 2013.10.16 2012고단5812