1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the assault of the victim C, D, and E is committed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 18, 2018, the Defendant reported the victim H (n, 27 years of age) who intends to get a taxi on the way front of G convenience stores located in the Guri-siF on July 18, 2018, and without any reason, she voluntarily took a bath, and walked the victim three times in the course of the victim, and the Defendant assaulted the victim H by having the victim go through the victim H with the convenience store.

2. On July 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) arrested the victim H in the act of assaulting on the ground that he was in the act of assaulting the victim; and (b) took a bath in the process of being detained into a detention room located on the first floor of the Guri-ri Police Station 359 Guriri-gu, 359 Guri-ri, Gari-si; (c) divided the body part of the person belonging to the Guri-ri Police Station I into his fingers; and (d) interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of personal illness and criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. Each statement made to H and J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV images of a G convenience store, capse photographs, slopingJ photographs, and damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act, Articles 260 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes committed by obstructing the execution of heavy official duties) are as follows: (a) there is no motive for committing a crime; or (b) there is no motive for committing a crime against people of the general society or a specific class; or (c) there is no non-discriminatory or broad range of unspecified persons.

The crime of questioning the above is not only an infringement of the individual victims’ personal legal interests, but also an invasion of the fear that many members of the society can be a victim at any time in a situation where they do not voluntarily deposit, and thereby, it is safe by allowing members of the society to raise a question about social safety.