logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1983. 11. 22. 선고 83므32,33 판결
[이혼,위자료][공1984.1.15.(720),106]
Main Issues

Examples of serious causes which make it difficult to continue the marriage;

Summary of Judgment

Although her husband knew that her husband was a patient suffering from a disease while living together after the conclusion of matrimonial engagement, her husband erred in health management, such as drinking, drinking, alcohol, etc., and even though her husband was involved in a traffic accident due to an occurrence of a disease caused by a liver-type disease, her husband and her husband returned to her husband and her husband entered her husband and her husband who was in a separate state and was in a separate state. If her husband was prosecuted by indecent act, she constitutes a cause for judicial divorce under Article 840 subparagraph 16 of the Civil Act.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 840 of the Civil Act

Claimant, Appellee, Appellee

Appellant, Appellee

appellee, appellant, appellant-Appellant

appellee, appellant, etc.

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 83Reu31,32 decided June 20, 1983

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the appellee.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the respondent are examined.

According to the judgment of the court below, the appellant and the appellee were justified by taking account of the following facts: the defendant's 0th of July 197 and the defendant's 10th of July 1, 200 were not allowed to live together with his father and 1st of May 8, 197, and the marriage report was completed 10.31 of the same year; the appellant was hospitalized between 1976.11.21 and 29th of the same month, and the defendant did not appear to have been at the time of the above 1st of October 197, and the defendant did not have any error of law regarding the defendant's 4th of March 20, the court below's 8th of June 2007. The court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the defendant's 4th of March 21, 2007. The defendant's 1st of June 1978, 2007.

Therefore, the appeal shall be dismissed and the costs of the appeal shall be borne by the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Shin Jong-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow