logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고정2099
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2014, the Defendant: (a) lent KRW 3 million to C as indicated in paragraph (3) at the Defendant’s house located in the Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) lent KRW 3 million to C as collateral; and (c) signed I on the name following the Defendant’s address address; (c) write “E” in the deposit column; (d) on the lessor’s address column, “E”, “F”, and “G” in the telephone column; and (d) written in the resident registration number column; and (e) written in the agent address column, “H” and “I” in the name column; and (e) written in the agent address column, “H” and “I” and “I” in the name column.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a letter of real estate lease agreement in the name of G and I, which is a private document on rights and duties.

2. On August 2014, the Defendant used a forged private document by borrowing KRW 3 million from the Defendant’s home, as if he were a document that actually formed a forged real estate lease agreement, as described in paragraph (1), to C, who is aware of the forgery at the Seocho’s home.

3. The defrauded presented forged real estate lease agreement to the victim C, as stated in Paragraph 2, at the time and place indicated in Paragraph 1, and the Defendant took place as if he/she had a right to deposit KRW 50 million.

However, in fact, the above real estate lease agreement was forged, and the amount of KRW 47.5 million, out of the deposit amount of KRW 50 million, was loaned from the Korea Housing Corporation (LH) to the loan for the loan for the loan for the loan for the new marriage. At that time, the Defendant was a person with bad credit standing, so there was no intention or ability to repay even if the Defendant borrowed KRW 3 million from the victim.

The Defendant received a total of KRW 3 million from the first police officer on August 2014 to the 26th day of the same month from the victim as the borrowed money.

(i) the evidence;

arrow