1. The Defendant’s KRW 3 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from October 6, 2016 to August 31, 2017.

According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the original defendant became aware of each other from around 2014 to 100, in the singing stores, etc., the plaintiff refused the defendant's request for lending money and the defendant did not join the fraternity recommended by the defendant; the defendant sent to the plaintiff the words "years according to", "Woo Dob Dob b b b c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c.

As above, the defendant made intimidation to the plaintiff via a text phone or face-to-face communication several times, which constitutes a tort against the plaintiff.

Since it is clear in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered a lot of mental pain, the defendant has a duty to pay the plaintiff with money for the above mental pain.