1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Defendant committed an unlawful act that infringes on the marital life between the Plaintiff and C by frequently communicating with the Plaintiff’s spouse C from before 2017, accompanying the Plaintiff’s spouse’s business trip, accompanying the Plaintiff’s business trip, leaving the Plaintiff’s office, etc., and committing an unlawful act. Therefore, the Defendant sought payment of consolation money of KRW 30 million.10

2. According to the overall purport of each of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 6, the plaintiff is a married couple who completed the marriage report with C on May 2, 2013, the defendant's singing-to-sing-sing-to-sing-sing-outing-s-outing-outing-s-outing-outing-outing-out-s-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-out-outing-outing

However, it is difficult to see that the Defendant singing the Defendant as a customer while playing in singing, and that the Defendant singing the Defendant as a customer; ② the Defendant and C maintained the relationship between the Defendant and C, but it is difficult to see that the Defendant singing the Defendant as an unlawful act; ③ the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone was in any physical relationship between the Defendant and C.

or C was shot in the Republic of Korea with the Defendant.

In light of the fact that it is insufficient to recognize the fact of exchanging contact as if it were or frequent, it is difficult to deem that the Defendant infringed a couple’s communal living between the Plaintiff and C, interfered with the maintenance thereof, and infringed the Plaintiff’s right as the spouse, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.