1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. As to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff agreed to sell the Plaintiff’s vehicle (C) to the Defendant on the condition that the Defendant would pay the unpaid installments of KRW 12,500,000 (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s assertion”) on or around March 10, 2014, and delivered the said vehicle. However, the Plaintiff did not pay the said installments on behalf of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff paid the installment on or around January 15, 2017, and the installment payment was completed on or around January 15, 2017, the Plaintiff claimed the Defendant to pay the said KRW 12,50,000 and delay damages.

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that there was an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the assertion.

The Plaintiff’s assertion premised on the existence of such an agreement is rejected.

2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason.