1. The Defendant’s KRW 70,549,342 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from April 6, 2019 to October 1, 2019.

1. There is no dispute over the cause of the claim. In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the defendant continued to be supplied with steel materials after setting the end of each month from the plaintiff as due date for payment, and on March 8, 2019, the amount of goods which was not repaid to the plaintiff as of March 8, 2019 was 71,549,342. The defendant repaid 1,000,000 to the plaintiff on April 15, 2019 as the price for goods, and the plaintiff appropriated the above KRW 1,00,000 as the principal for the unpaid goods.

(C) According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 70,549,342 won (71,549,342 won - 1,000,000 won) accrued from April 6, 2019 to October 1, 2019, which is the date following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, the defendant's objection against the existence of the obligation to pay the plaintiff 70,549,342 won (as above, 71,549,342 won - 1,000 won) and the amount calculated by each ratio of 12% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit.