The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (2,00,000 won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant committed the instant crime at the time when it was economically difficult to do so, and all of the instant crimes are recognized and reflected.

The defendant was not paid for the transfer of the head of the Tong, and the fact that the amount of embezzlement after the re-issuance of the cash card is relatively small amount is recognized.

The crime of this case is a crime of violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, etc. for which judgment has become final and conclusive, and the relationship of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

However, since the crime of this case not only undermines the reliability of the safety performance of electronic financial transactions, but also has a significant adverse impact on society, such as massing of victims by abusing various illegal acts such as Bosing fraud crimes, there is a need to cope with more strict measures.

In the actual case, the access media transferred by the defendant was used for the crime of fraud.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal records, motive and background leading to the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances that led to the instant crime, even if considering the aforementioned circumstances favorable to the Defendant, it is not determined that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.