(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.08.09 2016고정144

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.08.09 2016고정144

집회및시위에관한법률위반

Text

The sentence of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the representative of the D Promotion Committee.

The Defendant on June 26, 2015, on behalf of the Committee for the Promotion of the Dissenting Party, on behalf of the Defendant, “from June 29, 2015 to the Military Station in the Manananan Police Station.

7. During the period of 24. 22:0 to 22:00, an outdoor assembly report was submitted to the effect that the organizer will hold a meeting demanding the opposition against E-combined shopping mall salesroom occupants from 50m in front of the office of guard in the south-do, South-do, South-do, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, from 07:0 to 22:00, to 500, the number of participants, and reported the venue and method of holding the meeting to the effect that the place and method of holding the meeting is approximately 1.6m in front of the Do office of guard and the lower 50m in front of the second 50-lane.”

Nevertheless, on June 29, 2015, the Defendant opened the relief that “to oppose the saleroom occupants, to demand the Do Governor’s interview” in order to express his/her intent to carry out his/her opinion, such as approximately 400 participants, at the place of an assembly reported at around 11:20 on June 29, 2015, carried out 72 meters from the place of an assembly reported to the police in advance to leave the assembly, and to enter the east Do government.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an act clearly deviating from the scope of the reported place as the organizer of an assembly or demonstration.

2. Defendant B is a person appointed as a custodian of the D Promotion Committee’s order.

The defendant shall ensure that the order of an assembly or demonstration is maintained in compliance with the instruction of the organizer, and shall not commit any act clearly deviating from the scope of reported place, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant committed 72 meters to the place of assembly or demonstration where the participants of assembly or demonstration did not report in advance.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an act clearly deviating from the scope of the reported place as a person who maintains the order of an assembly or demonstration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the Defendants’ respective legal statements (No. 2.

유사 판례

-대법원 2017.11.29 2017도13853

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2013.12.24 2013고정263

-대구지방법원 2014.07.18 2014고단2322

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.24 2016노376

-대전지방법원 2016.10.20 2016노844