Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the corporation D (hereinafter referred to as "D") who is in charge of building management of the Seo-gu Daejeon building, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and Defendant B is the director of the management office of the building of the above C.

1. While Defendant A was entrusted with the management of the C building composed of 39 stores from December 1, 2007 to December 1, 2007 under the name of Defendant A, the written indictment stating that “ around March 2008” was stated in the written indictment around December 2008. However, since the time when the written indictment was received on December 29, 2008, the time when the written indictment was received shall be deemed to be a clerical error in the “ around December 2008,” it shall be corrected as above.

The Daejeon District Court filed a lawsuit against G, which is the owner of the above building E and F, seeking a total of KRW 45,797,120,00 for delinquent management expenses of the above two stores, as the Daejeon District Court No. 2008da74038. During the lawsuit, Defendant B, the managing director, in order to prove that D had been duly appointed as the manager of the building C, an aggregate of at least 4/5 of the sectional owners of the building C and at least 4/5 of voting rights, was legally appointed as the manager of the building C, which is an aggregate building, by a written agreement of at least 4/5 of the voting rights, had the intent to arbitrarily supplement the “owner” of the written consent agreement

At around March 4, 2009 to the above C building management office, through employees, etc. whose name cannot be known, the Defendants conspired to enter in the column for sectional owners of the management rules regarding subparagraph H of the above building at the same time as “K and L,” and the sectional owners’ representative column at the sectional owners’ meeting, “K and L,” respectively, the management rules, which are sectional owners, are private documents concerning rights and obligations, were formulated, respectively, for the purpose of arbitrarily stating in the column for sectional owners of the management rules regarding subparagraph Ma as “S, Seo-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City,” and in the column for sectional owners of the management rules on subparagraph Ma, with the intent of arbitrarily stating in the column for sectional owners, “O,” and “O,” respectively.

2. The Defendants, in collusion, cannot be identified at the above C Building Management Office around March 4, 2009.