logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.21 2020고정1354
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019, the Defendant is a person who operated a Class 1 entertainment tavern under the Juvenile Protection Act, which is a business establishment banned from employing juveniles, or a group of entertainment tavern under the Food Sanitation Act, which is a business establishment banned from employing juveniles.

1. The owner or an employee of a business establishment banned from access by and employing juveniles shall verify the age of each person entering the business establishment and shall prohibit juveniles from entering the business establishment;

Nevertheless, at around 04:30 on August 9, 2019, the Defendant did not verify the age of juvenile D (ma, 19 years of age) and allowed the Defendant to enter the said entertainment tavern.

2. No one shall sell drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. to juveniles;

Nevertheless, the Defendant sold the amount equivalent to KRW 1.7 million, such as alcohol and alcohol, to juvenile D at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of the police statement of the defendant to the defendant's legal statement D (the defendant's statement of the defendant's statement of the defendant's statement of the defendant's court and the third party currency of the defendant), internal investigation report (the father's E currency of the defendant's father D - D's side and the letters of the plaintiff's entertainment business establishment C) and investigation report (the father's E currency of the defendant's father is not memory, but D's identity belongs to the person's father's identity and drinking is the same on the day of the case) 112 report statement, the application of the Act

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Juvenile Protection Act, Article 28 (1) of the same Act, Article 59 subparagraph 8 of the Juvenile Protection Act, Article 29 (2) of the same Act, the selection of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) imposes a heavy responsibility on the operators and employees of establishments which are prohibited from allowing juveniles to enter such establishments or selling alcoholic beverages, etc. in order to protect juveniles.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not take measures to confirm the age of juvenile D, such as confirming the identification card.

arrow