The judgment below

In the middle, the 's slope and unstableness of the atmosphere', the sleves of the sleves of the left, the sleves of the sleves of the sleves of the left,

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. If a citizen acquires a certain benefit and right due to a certain administrative disposition, the previous administrative disposition to revoke the previous administrative disposition must require the public necessity to revoke or revoke the administrative disposition to be cancelled due to a separate administrative disposition deprived of the existing benefit and right of the person already acquired. Furthermore, even if there is a defect in the administrative disposition, the administrative disposition can be cancelled only when it is strong to justify the disadvantage of the party to the public interest due to the necessity of public interest and cancellation, such as the infringement of the right to obtain and the protection of trust and the stability of legal life. The burden of proof on the need to revoke or revoke is an administrative agency that infringes on existing interest and rights.

(See Supreme Court Decision 201Du23375 Decided March 29, 2012, etc.) As to the instant disposition, the part regarding “surging and unstable surgical surgical surgical surgical surgical surgical surgicals” in the instant disposition

A. (1) The court below partially citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, asserted that the plaintiff was a person who performed a special military mission on March 11, 1982 when entering the Army on June 8, 1979, and on January 29, 2004, the plaintiff applied for registration of a person who performed a special military mission on March 11, 1982, and on January 29, 2004, the plaintiff was determined to be in conformity with the initial criteria for the registration of a person who performed a special military mission (hereinafter referred to as "accident in this case") to the defendant in the course of night combat training conducted for the first time on December 1, 1979 during military service, and determined that the plaintiff was unable to meet the initial criteria for the registration of a person who performed a special military mission (hereinafter referred to as "the accident in this case").