logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고단5151
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 8, 2013, at the court of Gwangju District Court No. 102, the Defendant testified after being present at the court of Gwangju District Court No. 14:30, and being notified of the right to refuse to testify as a witness of defamation case No. 2013Ma1618, the Defendant testified, “At that time, the witness testified, at that time, that “at the time, he testified that Defendant C had no knowledge of the fact that he would have “at the time, he would have been in an inappropriate relationship with the female” while intending the president D, and that he would not speak,” and “I asked the prosecutor’s question, “I had no desire.”

However, in fact, while the F-Temporary Chief Director Office in Gwangju Northern-gu is open, C had damaged D’s honor by voiceing D “I am feas, whether I amfe, I amfe, I amfe, I amfe, I amfe, I amfe, I do not amfe, I do not amfe, I do not have an inappropriate relationship.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of the examination protocol of the defendant (69 pages of investigation records);

1. Each legal statement of witness C, H and D;

1. A copy of each protocol of examination of witness by G or I (41 pages, 51 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (five pages of investigation records);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant found guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which did not properly grasp at the time of testimony as stated in the facts constituting an offense, and asked “In the presence of all other people, other than the Defendant, C, and D, whether C expressed a desire to and fright to D,” and answer the same as the facts constituting an offense. Thus, the Defendant made a statement contrary to memory.

arrow