Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 25,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from December 8, 2007 to August 26, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A. Around May 2001, the Plaintiff escaped to the U.S.A. while investigating the stock price manipulation and embezzlement related to “C”, and the prosecution suspended the prosecution against the Plaintiff. (2) The Plaintiff was arrested by the U.S. authority on May 2005, but the repatriation to the Republic of Korea was not made.
On October 2007, after D candidates were elected as F candidates for E, the Plaintiff expressed to the U.S. authorities the intent to withdraw a petition for personal protection and be repatriated to the Republic of Korea. On November 16, 2007, the Plaintiff was repatriated to the Republic of Korea by the U.S. court’s extradition ruling.
3) Before and after this, whether the Plaintiff’s choice of the domestic repatriation pursuant to the political planning related to F, and so-called “Planning entry theory” became the subject of political and social controversy. B) G around November 9, 2007, the draft of a letter suggesting that the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea after the Plaintiff promised to be the mother’s promise, and then delivered it to H.
2) Pursuant to the draft of the above letter, H means the letter "B" to Dong branch A of Dong in the form of sending I to the Plaintiff on November 10, 2007, according to the first letter (hereinafter "the letter of this case").
The author drawn up the letter of this case. The key contents of the letter of this case "I think that "I think that there was a certain error that I had been about and discussed with Inman, Inman and Mannman, Inman, Inman, and Inman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Innman, Inman, Innman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Inman, Innish, Inman, Innish, Innish Inish, Innish, Innish, Innish, Innish, Innish, Innish, Innnish, Innish, Innish, Innish, Innish, Innnish, Innnish, Innnish, Innnnish, Innnish, Inn
3 The defendant shall deliver the letter of this case to L Committee M Team N at the time, and N.