1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name 1) Business name public notice: Public notice of the business name: H on January 31, 201, the Ministry of Knowledge Economy public notice of H, April 4, 2012, I, and the J of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy public notice of April 29, 2013 (the extension of the enforcement period until December 2014): The defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation;

B. An application for adjudication on the use of land as of May 21, 2015 by Defendant Central Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “Defendant Central Land Expropriation Committee”) is subject to use on November 26, 2014: The amount of compensation of 2,361 square meters among 31,924 square meters and 392 square meters among 2,361 square meters and 392 square meters among 31,924 square meters and 8,746 square meters and 3 square meters among F forest land owned by the Plaintiffs as 1/4 shares: The date of commencement of use of each of the Plaintiffs 16,934,150 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”): The fact that there is no dispute over July 14, 2015 [based on recognition], subparagraph 1, subparagraph 2, subparagraph 2, and subparagraph 2-1, 2, subparagraph 3, 3, 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation did not file an application for adjudication within one year after the project approval was publicly announced on January 31, 201, and thus, the project approval was invalidated pursuant to Article 23(1) of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”).

B) There was no public announcement of inspection of a plan for compensation under Articles 26 and 15 of the Land Compensation Act, and there was no notification on the change of the plan for compensation or period of business against the Plaintiffs. There was no notification on the Plaintiffs’ implementation plan for electric source development business under Article 17 of the Enforcement Decree of the Electric Power Source Development Promotion Act. Although the Plaintiffs notified the Korea Electric Power Corporation of the appointment of an agent, the Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation did not make any notification related to the procedures for use of this case, and the Plaintiffs did not have an opportunity to state their opinions on the procedures for use. 2)