logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.09.11 2013노849
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts (Defendant 1) 1: (a) the defendant was not in the office at the time when he was allowed to use the F building as a car; (b) the victim H was not in the office; and (c) it is difficult to be evaluated as a "injury" under the Criminal Act as naturally cured; and (c) the defendant's act of driving is not a threat to the victim I and J. 3; and (d) the defendant paid the profits as agreed upon to the victim C by paying the profits to the victim C; and (d) the payment of the profits is suspended because it is no longer possible to make the scrap metal transaction due to the ex officio cancellation of the business registration of the LPP as to L operated by the defendant; and (e) the payment of the profits is suspended; and (d) the court below did not deceiving the victim C. Nevertheless, there was an error of misconception of the fact that the court below found the defendant guilty of all the facts charged in the instant case.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the act of causing death or injury to a group, etc.) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the act of causing death or injury to a deadly weapon, etc.). ① The victim H consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the court of the court below, and consistently called as soon as he/she arrived at his/her office by using the telephone with the defendant immediately before the occurrence of the instant case. The defendant was seated on his/her book and sent on his/her door through the window of the office, and stated that the vehicle was driven by the defendant from his/her will to the speed toward his/her office. ② The victim H stated that the victim H would go beyond his/her intention to escape from the initial investigation stage, and that the victim H is in need of two weeks medical treatment.

arrow