1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) against the Plaintiff, a patentee, the Intellectual Property Tribunal; and (b) a person having ordinary knowledge in the art to which the invention pertains pursuant to the prior invention 1 through 6, the claim 1 through 3 of the instant patent invention, against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “ordinary technician”).

(2) On September 23, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition for correction to correct the patented invention of this case on the ground that the nonobviousness is denied. (2) The Plaintiff filed a petition for correction of the patented invention of this case on September 23, 2014, where the said trial proceedings were pending.

(B) The Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board (hereinafter referred to as “instant Claim 1”) recognized a request for correction on March 31, 2015. However, on the ground that the nonobviousness of the instant Claim 2 is denied by prior inventions 1, 4, and 6, the instant trial decision citing the Defendant’s claim for invalidation of registration was rendered. (B) The Plaintiff’s title of the instant patent invention (Evidence (Evidence 3) invention: (2) the date of filing of the instant patent application / the date of registration / registration / registration : the date of the instant patent application / the date of the instant patent invention using multiple camera lines and the date of the instant patent application / the date of the instant patent application / the instant patent application / the date of disclosure of the video reproduction screen on July 29, 2007 / 207 / 1407/25, and the date of the instant patent application / 407/407 page of the video reproduction screen on the video reproduction screen.