A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On February 11, 2015, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim C at an irregular place and made a false statement to the victim C that “after the purchase of the Tti-gu RV vehicle, it would sell at the last time and then bring profits to the victim after receiving KRW 1,500,000 from KRW 1,000 to KRW 1,50,000,000,000 from KRW 1,100,000 from the purchase price of the vehicle.”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the money to the victim by purchasing the above vehicle with the idea to pay the personal debt.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 11 million from the victim to the corporate bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant.

B. On March 20, 2015, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim C at an unspecified place, and subsequently made a false statement to the victim C, stating, “I would like to receive money in return for selling at the last time after purchasing the RV vehicle, which is an dV vehicle, and then bring profits from selling at the expense of selling the vehicle.” As the purchase price of the vehicle, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C.

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the money to the victim by purchasing the above vehicle with the idea to pay the personal debt.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 34 million won from the victim to the new bank account (F) in the name of E.

C. On April 24, 2015, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim C at an insular place, and falsely concluded that “The Defendant would purchase a new lane in the name of the wife and repay the money in return for the purchase of a new lane.” First, the Defendant borrowed KRW 12.6 million in advance of the purchase of a vehicle.”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the money to the victim by purchasing the above vehicle with the idea to pay the personal debt.

The Defendant is identical to this.