logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.15 2012고단8690 (1)
장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 1, 2012, at around 22:00, the Defendant purchased 300,000 won in total with knowledge of the fact that the 4 cost of smartphones, such as Galgal Dogal HD, which he stolen from the taxi drivers in front of the police box located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, that they stolen from the taxi drivers, to the victims who are taxi passengers, and acquired stolen goods.

2. On September 22, 2012, around 22:00, the Defendant purchased 150,000 won in total with knowledge of the fact that smartphone 2 cost, such as gallon LTE, stolen from the taxi engineers in front of the written railway station located in the Busan Seodong-dong, Busan, and acquired stolen goods from the taxi drivers in front of the written railway station located in Busan, Busan, but who are passengers of the taxi.

3. On September 22, 2012, the Defendant purchased 22:00,000 won in total and acquired stolen goods from the taxi engineers on the front side of the gallon road located in the Yansan-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, with knowledge of the fact that the total of 15 smartphones, including gallon 4, gallon gallon 7, gallon 25, and observer 1,500,000,000 won, which were stolen by them from the taxi drivers on the front side of the gallon road located in the Y

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police suspect examination protocol regarding D;

1. Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order causes other crimes to sell smartphones to the defendant, and the smartphones purchased and sold by the defendant can be used for other crimes, etc. The defendant repents and reflects wrongs, and the defendant has no same kind of power, etc., and the motive, background, means and methods of the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime, and other arguments of this case are made.

arrow