Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 23:35, 2018, at the Defendant’s residence of the Sinpo City BJ 202, the Defendant: (b) “Isk, fin, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, find; (c) find, find at a coffee shop; (d) find, find, and reported by her husband at a coffee shop; and (e) find, find, find, etc., sent to the site upon receiving a report from 112 report that “Isk and find, find the Defendant to enter the place of residence to check the site.”

Sheeted with the inside of the house without the permission of the head of the sibbbb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb, kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kk, and continuously

“At the same time,” referring to two hand to d’ and bat off the bats of d’ and bathers several times, and bat off the cell phones possessed D.

In order to do so, there was an assault on the cell phone, such as putting the cell phone on the floor in the place.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention of danger and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on investigation, a photographic data of damaged parts, and a list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (verification of documentary evidence and images and spouse's statements);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of interference with the execution of official duties by exercising violence against a police officer dispatched after receiving a report of 112 reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires a strong response to the protection of the law and order and the eradication of the light of public authority: Provided, That the fact that the defendant reflects the mistake, that the defendant committed a contingent crime by entering the house under the influence of alcohol, and that there was no history of the same kind of crime.