The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, September 23, 201.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not contain any fact that the Defendant made an insulting speech to the victim D, and in particular, the insult of the victim on September 22, 201 did not constitute a performance, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged in the instant case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. On September 22, 2011, the lower court duly admitted and investigated the following circumstances: (i) the wife I of the victim D, who was in an apartment at the time of the instant crime, consistently testified that the Defendant was humiliated in a large amount; (ii) the date and time of the instant crime is about 10:20 minutes per hour, and the place is an apartment corridor; and (iii) E, in the investigative agency and the court of the lower court, at the investigative agency and the court of the lower court, was going to walk the elevator on the 14th floor, and it appears that the Defendant was humiliated with a large voice before the house of the victim D with the victim of the 14th floor at the time of the instant case, and made a statement that the Defendant was humbing with a large voice, and thus, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

나. 2011. 9. 23. 모욕 부분 1) 이 부분 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2011. 9. 23. 11:30경 서울 강남구 C아파트 상가동 309호실 소재 리모델링주택조합의 사무실에서 F, G, H가 듣고 있는 가운데, 전날 전화통화 중 언쟁한 것과 관련하여 D와 말다툼을 하다가 위 D에게 ”저 자식 나쁜 인간이네, 저게 완전 똘아이네, 저 인간이 저 모양이야.“라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다. 2) 판 단 가 피고인의 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피고인이 이 부분 공소사실과 같이 말한 사실이 있다고 진술하는...