logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.13 2018고정1427
폭행
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are known to the general public, and victims D(24) are employed in E.

1. On February 23, 2018, Defendant A expressed his desire to prevent access to the E shop located in G in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on February 14:08, to the effect that the victim, who is an employee, was able to ask for the job movement during the course of driving and coffee, and assaulted the victim’s boom by hand.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph 1, he reported to the police that he reported to the police that the injured person wanted to go to the toilet in the course of his speech with the above victim for the foregoing reasons, and assaulted twice the victim’s left knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on-site inspection and CCTV verification);

1. The Defendants: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for negligence

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendants are aged, the economic situation is difficult, and there is no record of punishment for the same crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment for about 20 years, and Defendant B’s assault is minor. However, the crime of this case was requested to move the victim’s place of entry into the relevant store without obtaining any permission. However, there are many circumstances for the defendants to consider the defendants in the course of the crime, because the defendants committed the act of assaulting the victim or dysing the victim on the floor while refusing the request, and the defendants did not reach an agreement with the victim.

arrow