1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where each of the “bruptal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal brutal bruts” in the judgment of the court of first instance and “brut brut brut brut

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s overwork and stress on the part of the deceased caused the her immunological disorder of the deceased, resulting in a acute bruptal tymosis and dyposis infection on the deceased, and the overwork and stress of the deceased aggravated the above disease, thereby resulting in the death of the deceased through the brupt infection.

Therefore, even though proximate causal relation is recognized between the deceased’s death and his official duties, the instant disposition against the Plaintiff, which determined the compensation for survivors’ compensation, should be revoked as unlawful.

(b) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes.

C. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) the work performed by the deceased; (b) the intensity, etc. of the deceased; and (c) the part of the average health condition of the third deceased, as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the same is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) the remainder is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act; and (d) the main sentence

『4) 사망 직전 상황과 망인의 상태 가 망인은 2012년 10월경부터 입술이 계속 마르고 부르트면서 혓바늘이 돋는 등의 증세를 호소하였고, 잦은 기침 등 감기증세를 보이면서 상당히 피곤해하였다.

From December 2012, the sporadic heat has been recovered from sporadic sporadic sporadic spodic spodic spodic spodic spodic spodic spodic spodic spodic s

Nevertheless, the deceased will play lives.