logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.03.30 2015고정1364
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and C, in collusion with D (Korean men), E (Korean men), F (Vetnam Women), G (Vetnam Women), H (Korean side recruiters), and name-free boxes (Korean side recruiters), by creating a letter of invitation to use a certified transcript of the family register recorded as if they were married, in a disguised marriage between Vietnamese women and Korean nationals, enter the Republic of Korea to receive the consideration,

1. On January 1, 2011, the Defendant and C obtained the offer of a disguised marriage telephone from H and obtained the consent of D and E, and entered the airport of Kimhae on March 12, 201, and entered the Republic of Korea by air on March 12, 2011, and, on March 14, 2011, the Defendant and C met F with the purpose of a disguised marriage, and E with the purpose of a disguised marriage.

Around March 15, 2011, the Defendant and C entered Korea with D, and F, G, certificate of marital conditions, confirmation of marital status, birth certificate, resident registration certificate, etc. issued in Vietnam, and had the public official in charge of the family register enter the false facts in the electronic records information system of the public register by having the public official in charge of the civil petition office submit a report of marriage stating false facts as if they were married normally, to the public official in charge of the family register in the civil petition office of the public register of the Tong Young-si, Tong, which is located in the coast of Tong Young-si, through the public service center of the public register of Tong-si, which is located in the coast of Tong Young-si, and on April 13, 2011.

2. The Defendant and C immediately had the contents entered into the family register information system as referred to in paragraph 1 operated, thereby allowing them to be exercised.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of the current status of entry into and departure from Korea by individual and investigation reports (Attachment to Category C written judgments);

1. Article 228(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of entry of an electronic record and the choice of fines) on criminal facts, the pertinent provision of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and Articles 229 and 228(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow