Text
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 3,500,000 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from September 24, 2013 to April 15, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 30, 2012, the Plaintiff concluded a construction contract with the Defendant by setting the construction cost of KRW 82,500,000 (including value added tax) for the National Expressways No. 30 Line B of the Motorway No. 30 (hereinafter “instant construction”) between the Defendant and the Defendant.
(hereinafter “instant construction contract”). B.
On October 20, 2012, the Plaintiff delivered the instant construction to the Defendant under the condition that part of the instant construction was not performed.
C. From August 14, 2012 to October 18, 2012, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 71,000,000 (including surtax) out of the instant construction cost.
[Ground of recognition] The items of evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 4, the witness C, and D's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiff's assertion is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 50,483,050 won plus KRW 38,133,050,000, which is the amount payable for the construction work of this case.
나. 피고의 주장 ① 원고가 이 사건 공사 중 믹스 라이너 및 쎌 교체공사를 미시공함으로 인한 손해배상금 857만 원, ② 원고가 이 사건 공사 중 후방설비공사를 미시공함으로 인한 솜해배상금 1130만 원, ③ 원고의 이 사건 공사 하자로 인하여 피고가 보수공사대금으로 지출한 1646만100 원, ④ 원고의 이 사건 공사의 미시공, 하자, 공사지연 등으로 인하여 피고는 이 사건 공사의 원청으로부터 피고의 공사대금을 감액당하는 손해를 입었으므로 그로 인한 손해금 35,000,000원의 손해가 발생하였는바, 원고는 피고에게 그 중 46,000,000원 및 이에 대한 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.
3. Determination
A. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the determination as to the Plaintiff’s cause of the principal claim, it is apparent that the present amount payable for the construction cost of this case remains 11,50,000 won (82,500,000 won-71,000,000 won) and therefore, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the above amount and this.