logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.14 2015가합71804
실시료 등 청구
Text

1. Defendant Korea Expressway Corporation: (a) KRW 1,858,670,000 for the Plaintiff and its therefrom from December 31, 2015 to July 14, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the Korea Highway Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) around March 2010, around March 2010.

(2) The term “original contract construction work” refers to the term “original contract construction work” (hereinafter referred to as “original contract construction”) of the national expressway No. 30 that the Defendant Corporation orders.

(2) Of the instant construction works, B B B & C PCs (hereinafter “instant construction”).

(C) A patent (registration number D; hereinafter “instant patent”) with respect to “C” owned by the Plaintiff.

(2) The Agreement on the Use of New Technology for the use of the new technology was concluded (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Agreement on the Use”).

The main contents of this Convention are as follows. The purpose of this Convention is to conclude a contract with an owner of a new technology (patent) so that the Plaintiff may use the said new technology (patent) for the said construction work, as the owner of the said construction work, with respect to the section A of the expressway construction project from the resident resident of the expressway No. 30 to the Young River. (1) In the event that the whole or part of the construction work for which a new technology (patent) is used under Article 4 is able to secure construction and quality by using the technical know-how of the owner, or where construction and quality are able to be secured by using the special equipment owned by the owner of the technology, etc., the Plaintiff may execute the subcontract from the successful bidder. (2) In the event that the Plaintiff receives a subcontract from the successful bidder pursuant to paragraph (1), the Plaintiff shall enter into a subcontract for the scope of the subcontract through a smooth consultation with the bidder, and the Plaintiff shall enter into a subcontract in consultation with the successful bidder and the Plaintiff within the scope of the fair order of the construction work (including construction cost).

arrow