A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,00,000 as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Seogu District Court Seo branch on May 13, 201, and a fine of KRW 5,50,000 as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Gwangju District Court on November 11, 20

around 02:55 on March 29, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.160% in blood, the Defendant driven a car in the Bnish column from the Pungcheon cafeteria cafeteria parking lot located in the Donjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seojin-gu to the same 170-ro, the 3rd promotionable apartment complex with approximately 6km off the 6km off the apartment complex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. An investigation report (related to the application of the above dmark formula);

1. Selection of a sentence provided for in Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act regarding the facts constituting an offense subject to the relevant Act and subordinate statutes, such as a written reply to inquiries about criminal history, etc.;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Act on the Mitigation of Small Quantity, the observation of protection under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act, and Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order and Order to Attend the pertinent case’s driving of drinking, the Defendant was in a state of drinking to the extent that the Defendant was unable to properly memory his driving, even though he had already been punished by a fine due to driving of drinking, and the Defendant had already been under the influence of drinking at once, and other circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, living environment, and alcohol concentration and driving distance at the time of crackdown.