logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.23 2013고단959
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 959"

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a camera car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escape vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (ii).

On January 26, 2013, at around 00:30, the Defendant proceeded along the intersection of the private distance of the registered vehicle, which is located in the Hodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seoul, according to one-lane, from the side of the Hosung police box to the direction of Songcheon-dong.

In such cases, drivers are obliged to drive safely according to road conditions and the structure and performance of the vehicle by accurately operating the steering system, brakes and other devices of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stated in the indictment “0.122%” in the blood alcohol concentration of 0.079%, but the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration of the Defendant at the time of the accident is recognized as 0.079% as follows, as seen in the following paragraphs 2 and the acquittal part.

By negligence, while driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, the victim D was driven by the victim D after the signal waiting at the same lane, and the left side of the Eran vehicle was received as the front right side of the Defendant vehicle.

Ultimately, while driving under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as light salt, which requires a two-day medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, the repair cost of KRW 3,806,425, such as the exchange of panions, did not take necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle owned by the victim and providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driving a C Car with alcohol content of about 0.079% in alcohol level at a section of about 1.5 km from the front of Kz apartment apartment to the front of the second apartment apartment in the same Dong, which is the promotion under the influence of alcohol level of around 1.5 km at around the day specified in paragraph (1).

"2016 Highest 724" Defendant on May 11, 2016.

arrow