logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 04. 28. 선고 2016두31463 판결
주식 양수에 따른 부당행위계산부인시 가산세 적용의 적법여부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court-2015-Nu-11453 ( December 17, 2015)

Title

Whether the application of penalty tax is legitimate in the case of a wrongful calculation based on the acquisition of stocks;

Summary

Since it is difficult to regard the Plaintiff as underreporting the tax base due to such active acts as making it difficult to detect the facts requiring taxation or forging false facts, the application of the penalty tax for unjust underreporting is illegal.

Related statutes

Article 47-3 of the National Tax Basic Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du31463 Decided revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

○○ Co., Ltd.

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court 2015Nu11453

Imposition of Judgment

2016.28

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant’s grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, all of the appeals are dismissed and the costs of appeal are assessed against each party under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow